Is the Supreme Court Really Conservative?
But she did, and now, with a dose of pot every couple of hours, Raich is functioning normally... and still alive, which might not be the case without the pot. She's lucky to live in a state, California, where medical marijuana is legal.
Her story is resoundingly familiar to me... I have a friend who also survives and thrives because of marijuana use for symptom control. Unfortunately, my friend lives in a right-wing barbarian fascist state where there's no medical marijuana law - so my friend must remain anonymous.
But, back to Raich... California allows medical marijuana, but the Federal government does not... and, today, the Supreme Court is hearing her suit claiming that the Federal government lacks jurisdiction to interfere with her medical marijuana use.
This puts the conservative Supreme Court in a quandry. Raich's claim is clearly true on its face. She grows her own pot, for her own use. There's no commercial activity involved. There's certainly no interstate commerce. The Constitution does not give the Federal government any authority at all in such matters.
So, to rule against Raich, the court will have to ignore the Constitution and just make up new law from whole cloth... exactly what conservatives are always accusing liberal judges of doing.
So are the justices really conservative... or are they just evil old men (and woman) who enjoy condemning a cancer patient to a painful death? (I'm actually inclined to believe that many "conservatives" really are just this kind of evil, but it's certainly not what they claim to be.)
I await this decision with interest. Either the court will affirm medical marijuana use and we will see a flood of states following California's lead or the justices will impeach themselves with their own corruption.





